Posts Tagged ‘online marketing’

6 SEO Sharks,
And How To Avoid Them

SEO Shark

Shark illustration for C3 Advertising by Jennifer Mason

When the conversation starts, everything’s rosy. The sky is Disney pink and blue. The birds are singing. And then a friend or colleague says, “We just found someone who’s going to to get us to the top of search engine rankings.”

That’s when everything changes. My stomach churns. The sky grows dark. In my head, I hear the soundtrack from Jaws. “DUH duh…DUH duh…DUH duh…” And I hold my breath in fear until I learn whether the story has a happy ending.

A happy ending is that the friend has found an honest and competent SEO resource. Another happy ending is that the friend has been lured in by a shark, but hasn’t yet signed a contract or paid any money.  There’s still a chance I can turn the boat around and steer it safely back to land.

The unhappy ending, of course, is that my friend or colleague has spent money on something that will not do them any good, and may do them considerable harm.  Rather than wait for any more of those conversations, I thought I’d share six types of SEO sharks, and tell you how you can protect yourself.

Some are old, some new. Some are truly dangerous, others merely a waste of money. Some I thought were dead, until they recently poked their ragged fins out of the water.

1. I’ll Take You To The Top, Baby

Confusing the sizzle with the steak

How it works: Someone offers to put you at the top of search engine results with their “magic” combinations of keyword phrases, multiplied blogs, long landing pages of nonsensical keywords, and specially written content. (Usually, the “specially written content” is so bad that you would be embarrassed to be seen in public with it.)

The theory: If you get out of the crowded field of your competition and focus on highly specific keyword combinations, you’ll quickly rank on the first page of Google search-engine results.

Celebrity butterfly sneakers

We're #1...if the search term is "the butterfly sneakers that Joe Celebrity wore the last time he went to court"

The fact: You might actually get to the top of the mountain.  But it will be the wrong mountain, and  nobody will be there. For example, say you’re a new brand of sneakers. On a search of “sneakers”, you’re on page 14, below Nike, Reebok, Zappo’s, and Converse. But on a search with a more specific keyword phrase recommended by the experts: “the butterfly sneakers that Joe Celebrity wore the last time he went to court” — you’re #1! And you’ll stay #1, for the one person per year who is going to search for that term. By total coincidence, that one person may even be someone who works for the company that sold you the service.

Red flag #1: Performance guarantees, if any, only promise to deliver first-page rankings on the company’s “recommended” search terms.

Red flag #2: You often have to pay hefty fees for the service in advance.

Red flag #3: During the sales process, no one ever talks about conversions or sales. In the pitch, and in abundant testimonials, the focus is only on rankings as the goal.

In all the years I’ve been working with SEO, in all the various forms that this keyword “program” has taken, I’ve only ever found ONE company that claimed success with one of these programs. No one else– no client, no acquaintance, no colleague–has ever been able to point to a single qualified lead that came through their site from one of these programs, let alone a conversion to a sale. The company that claims success believe they had an extra $10K in sales during their program. That sounds great, except that the program cost $10K. Their net increase is thus zero–if you don’t count the sales lost from the $10K of budget they diverted from actual advertising.

How to do it better: First, and most important, don’t forget that your goal is sales, not search engine rankings. (Click here for a free downloadable reminder.) Second, if you’re competing in a very crowded field, use search — and relevant content, and other media — to target smaller niche audiences first. Plan your campaigns well, and build from there.

2. Stuffing Your Meta Tags With Popular Keywords

Simple! Understandable! Except that you don’t need it anymore

Old-fashioned Zeppelin

Zeppelin maintenance programs: Handy once, but no longer useful.

I wrote about this once before, so I’ll keep it short.

How it works: For a monthly fee, an SEO “expert” offers to research all the popular search terms, and update your website’s meta tags on a frequent basis, usually weekly.

The theory: People who are searching for the keywords of the day will find your site. The more sophisticated practitioners of this art also point out that changing your keywords changes your content frequently, which search engines like.

The fact: This isn’t evil so much as it is outdated. There are a lot of things wrong with this theory — targeted marketing, anyone? — but the most obvious is that Google doesn’t use meta tags anymore, precisely because people did stuff like this. So signing up for a meta tag service is like buying a service to keep your Zeppelin filled with hydrogen.

Red flag: It sounds great, but only if you don’t think about it too hard.

SEO consequences: You’ve wasted your money, but Google won’t get mad at you. You’ll just be ignored.

A better way: Implement a good, real search strategy that includes pay-per-click, and update your website content — your actual content — regularly, with information that’s useful to your target audience.

3. Irrelevant Reciprocal links

Google, Yahoo, and Bing really do judge you by the company you keep

How it works: You get a polite email — coincidentally, like the one I got this morning — inviting you to trade links with someone you’ve never heard of, usually in a three-way swap. (I’ll link to you from my site; you link to “my” other website). The URLs and code are included; both sites look legit, nobody asks you for any money. What could be the harm?

The theory: Links are good for you. So wouldn’t it be a good idea to trade links with other websites?

The fact: Links to your site are good for you. But not all links are equally good, and some are very, very bad.

Search engines count relevant links as one measure of content value. If I’m writing a blog about vegan cooking, and I link it to a food site that sells “Ten delicious substitutes for mozzarella”, search engines assume that I’m suggesting relevant content to their readers, and will rank the substitute-mozzarella site accordingly. Here’s how this one was supposed to work:

Example of proposed 3-way link

An educational software site links to a six-year-old site for a student film, which includes a link to the Services page of a PR firm. Red flag #1: there’s no relevant content connection among these three sites.

Your link is at the end of a list of hundreds of links

Red flag #2: Your site link will be at the end of a list of hundreds of links on the educational software site. They don’t look like links, and they don’t have any connection to what you do (in this case, the proposed list includes jewelry, auto parts, computer repair, loans, business consulting, travel to Greece, Indian call centers, hair color, forklifts, wrinkle cream, charcoal portraits, steam showers, Christmas stockings, dozens of SEO consultants, and a London handyman.)

Why it won’t work: It flunks the relevancy test.

SEO consequences: Small (search engines may just ignore it) to significant ( If it comes onto their radar — for example, if you submit your site to a search engine — they may reject your request, or blacklist you, and tell you to try again when you’ve cleaned up your act. )

A better way: Fill your website and blog with actual relevant content that will be of interest to people in your target audience, and then market it to let them know it’s there.

4. Link Farms

The very last reason you want to land at the top of search results–or in The New York Times

Movie facade

Websites created just to be link farms are no more real than these movie set facades.

How it works: Someone creates hundreds or thousands of small websites with relevant content. The sites have real content, they say all the right things about your category, and they link back to your site with vigor. The only problem is that the sites and URLs are all fake. They exist only to fool Google into thinking that the whole world is linking back to you. Or, the sites are legitimate, but the site owner is paid to link back to you.

The theory: Links from sites with relevant content are very, very good for you.

The fact: True. But search engines do not take kindly to being scammed with phony websites or drummed-up content, no matter how relevant.

Why it doesn’t work: It might, for a little while, until you are a) publicly humiliated and b) sent into exile by Google. Just search “J.C. Penney Google search fiasco” and see what happens. It is not, normally, a good sign to have your company name and “fiasco” in the same sentence.

Red flag: This service is not on the SEO consultant’s website. They suggest that you don’t bring it up in public. You are discouraged from asking other clients about it.

Hidden danger: We have heard that some of the content on these phony websites is plagiarized from other, legitimate websites. We haven’t seen examples of the phony pages, but it’s plausible — if your in-house or outsourced search team is generating hundreds of pages of phony links, and you aren’t paying them for hundreds of hours of copywriting, that text has to come from somewhere. If that’s the case, in addition to violating search engine webmaster terms, you could be adding copyright violation to your sea of troubles.

A better way: Think past the current quarter. You’ll be more successful in the long run, and you won’t have spent a small fortune to get kicked off of Google.

5.  Secret Knowledge

Only the Chosen Ones can understand SEO

Wizard with a crystal ball, some old books and candles, and other mystical stuff

Keyword research should be done methodically and professionally. But there's not a lot of mystery to it.

How it works: Someone offers to provide you with SEO services that will catapult you ahead of everyone else because the practitioner possesses “secret knowledge”, “insider information,” a “proprietary system”, or a methodology that’s “too complicated to explain.”

The theory: SEO is a chamber of secrets, and a few clever souls with secret knowledge–and your money–can game the system.

The fact: SEO is a discipline, and you get good at it the same way you get good at any other discipline: learn it, practice it, stay up on changes in the field, and strive to get better at it every day. There’s no doubt that some people do it better than others, but that makes SEO just like any other field.

But there is no secret society, no mysterious insight, no magic system that’s known only to a few worthy souls. Of course search engines keep the ever-changing details of their methodology and algorithms close to the vest; they are trade secrets. But the principles are widely known. Google even has a blog for webmasters and its own You Tube channel.

Red flag #1: If the process is so mysterious, there’s no way to tell if the person who’s offering the service knows what they’re doing. Real experts aren’t going to give you tutorials in how they do it, but they’re happy to give you enough details to let you know they’re knowledgeable. It’s the difference between a mechanic who explains the problem and shows you the part that needs to be replaced, and one who mumbles “it’s broken. I’ll fix  it.”

Red flag #2: If you don’t know what’s in the package, you can’t know if it’s worth the asking price.

Why it won’t–or will–work: In this case, you have two possible outcomes. The first is that the person is being mysterious because they really can’t deliver, and it’s a genuine scam. The second is that the person knows how to do it, but doesn’t want to tell you what’s involved, either out of fear that you’ll do it yourself, or because they’re overcharging for it.

6. Blog Spam

How to deeply annoy people you’ve never met

No Dumping - Violators Will Be Shunned

Nobody likes a blog spammer, either.

How it works: An SEO practitioner offers to insert your link into many blogs, most of which have nothing to do with your product category. Usually these comments are innocuous flattery and include a link that’s disguised in a long, nonsensical URL. On a blog about natural history museums, for example, someone will post a comment on the order of “best posting I’ve read all year!” and then includes a link to a website about carpet cleaning.

The theory: When bloggers link to your site, or when people mention you in blog comments, it’s valuable for your search engine rankings. Blog entries, comments, and links are seen as having a high probability of having relevant content.

The fact: Search engines know that people who blog about a topic, and those who comment on the blogs, are usually passionate about, or have some expertise in, the subject at hand. So yes, they do count this content as highly relevant. But just as much as relevant links count, irrelevant links don’t count. And let’s face it, this is really rude behavior. You wouldn’t like it if someone did it to your blog.

Red flag: If you’re considering paying someone to do something that you wouldn’t like to experience, it’s probably not a good idea.

Why it doesn’t work: Take your pick: 1) search engines don’t like irrelevant content or links. 2) Many bloggers have replaced automatic forums with options that let them review comments before posting. Some ban comments with links. 3) Blogging platforms like WordPress have added spam filters to their packages. 4) No one will like you. 5) You run the small, but very real, risk that a customer or prospect will see what you’re doing and be unimpressed.

For a while, this blog was getting two or three spam postings a week from an insurance company in Atlanta. When I got sick of trashing the comments, I called the insurance company. I spoke to a very nice lady, and confirmed what I’d suspected: they had contracted with a firm to do all their SEO, but didn’t know much about the details. They had no idea that they were offending a total stranger in California. They apologized for their vendor’s behavior, and the spam to this blog stopped immediately. They probably also breathed a sigh of relief that I wasn’t a potential customer.

How to do it better: Blogs are great, on so many levels. The good ones are gold mines of information about what’s on the minds of your target market. If someone in your industry — blogger, commenter, industry expert, customer — finds your website content valuable enough to mention, you’ve struck SEO gold. Writing one, or posting thoughtful, relevant, and appropriate comments to a topic, are good ways to establish and share your expertise, and get people to link to you. In other words, have good, relevant content.

Is this everything?

Unfortunately, no.

There are scammers, sharks, and the well-meaning but deeply misguided aplenty, and they’re all coming up with new ways to try to beat the SEO odds.

Moreover, search engines are changing the landscape all the time. Yahoo/Bing now accounts for a significantly larger volume of search. Google is rumored to be making significant changes in the near future.

So how do you protect yourself from SEO sharks, without becoming an expert in a field that’s changing daily? Here are a few simple guidelines:

  1. You’ve been hearing this since grade school, but it’s still valid: If it’s too good to be true, it probably isn’t.
  2. The major search engines have made it really easy to check out facts and fiction. Google has a webmaster blog and a channel on YouTube, and they’re in plain English. If someone offers you a service that sounds shady, search it. In a couple of minutes, you’ll have a much more solid understanding of the service being offered.
  3. If you don’t understand the service being offered, don’t buy it.

You Lost Me At “Hello” #1

Traps to avoid if you want your prospects to stick around past the handshake

#1 in a series.

Trap #1: The mysterious home page.

It’s cool. It’s pretty.  It’s got a talking head, animation, a soundtrack, an interest form, and half a dozen widgets. It’s crammed full of keywords that the SEO specialist gave you. It matches your brand personality, your product packaging, or the colors in the CEO’s office.  Yet none of that matters if the prospect needs more than three seconds to figure out what it is that you do.

That means:

  • The right words: A short, clear statement of what you offer. (Hint: it’s not your mission statement.)
  • Pictures that communicate. If you sell products, show them and/or their benefits. If you’re a charity, show the people you help. If you offer a service that’s harder to depict in a snapshot, work with creative professionals who can help you find images that quickly communicate what you do.
  • A look and feel that’s on brand. No matter what you do, you have competitors. Yet you differ from them in one or more ways that means something to your customers. That’s your USP (unique selling proposition). Are you the upscale custom brand? The low-price leader? The boutique brand?  The friendly one? The one with the huge array of offerings? The one that specializes in a niche? The one with overnight shipping?  Your USP should be reflected in every brand choice you make, from the colors in your design to the tone of your copy.

    And it goes without saying (I hope) that your website should have branding elements in common with marketing and advertising you do through print, direct mail, broadcast, trade shows, social media, and every other channel.

  • Cues to help your audience self-identify. Your visitors have to know, instantly, that the site is for them. It would be an easy thing to say, “This site is for…” and simply list the members of your target audience. Easy — but not very effective. It’s much better to include stories, situations, images, benefit headlines, and other cues that let your audience identify themselves as part of your target market, and recognize you as someone who understands and can meet their needs.

In short, does your home page pass the “Wheelbarrow Test”?

I admit it. I made up the Wheelbarrow Test years ago on the spur of the moment, out of frustration. I did it during a meeting with six insanely smart people.

Three of them were business geniuses and three were technical geniuses. They talked about complete solutions, world-changing innovation, unique business models and flexible innovation.  It was fabulous, and they were clearly excited. But after an hour of this, I still had no idea what they were planning to sell.

In desperation, I said, ”STOP. Take a deep breath.  Close your eyes.

“Imagine that your customer is standing in front of you with a wheelbarrow full of money. If he gives it to you, what does he get in exchange?  Is it a box with a product inside?  Is it hardware? Software?  Something to wear? Something to eat? A consultant showing up on his doorstep?  A subscription or a service?”

“If you can’t answer that question clearly on the home page, then your website will not succeed. And if your website is crucial to sales, neither will your company.”

The conference room got very quiet. The six geniuses looked at each other. Four of them said “Oh…” The two Europeans said, “Eaux…”  And at last they understood the critically important task at hand.

When we start working with a new client at C3 Advertising, invariably the first item on the client’s wish list is a website redesign.  Clients are often dismayed if their existing home page doesn’t pass the Wheelbarrow Test (although it often explains a lot about why their current site isn’t working).  But all is not lost.

“Cheer up,” I say. “Chances are, your competitors’ sites don’t pass the Wheelbarrow Test, either.”

Should You Be On Facebook?

Smashing Magazine had a very useful posting yesterday on how to create effective fan pages on Facebook. It turns out that creating an effective Facebook fan page takes just as much effort, design sense, good copywriting, and marketing savvy as any other advertising effort. Most of all, like the “real” web, an effective Facebook fan page also takes carefully crafted content with a high perceived value.

To that I say: duh. Too bad, but, duh.

(What’s a “fan page”? Unlike the U.S. Supreme Court, Facebook believes that people are different from business entities. This means that your business can have a  ”fan page,” but not a “profile”.  There are more restrictions on a fan page than on a profile; for example, you don’t have the ability to add friends.  The penalty for confusing the two is abrupt and ignominious removal from the Facebook universe. Ironically, that means it’s easier for a business to be tossed out than for an individual to erase their Facebook presence voluntarily.  So if you’re having trouble closing your Facebook profile account, I suggest you try changing your name to Giant Corporation, Inc. and see if they’ll close it down for you.)

Should your business even have a Facebook Fan Page?

It’s probably worth a try, if…

  • You’ve got a consumer brand that customers regularly engage with, or get passionate about.  Cars. Trendy clothing. Starbuck’s. A rock band. Organic knitting wool. Artisan olive oil. Boutique wines.
  • Your target market is a heavy user of Facebook. Examine your market closely. There is a big difference between “has a Facebook account” and “lives on Facebook”.
  • You offer a lot of coupons, short-term offers, or events. Facebook lends itself well to these kinds of programs.
  • You do it right, both creatively, and as part of a thoughtful online strategy.  This is not a task to leave to the summer intern.
  • You have all your other marketing ducks in a row. Facebook is cheap — however, as I’ll show in a minute, by no means free — but it’s no substitute for a real marketing program.

It wouldn’t hurt, and might help, if…

  • You’re a business-to-business marketer with an offbeat brand.
  • You have a cutting-edge product in an emerging field where there is a lot of discussion between product creators and end-users/consumers. But be cautious — where Facebook might be a good forum for interaction and brand-building if your product is a highly experimental surfboard, I’d steer clear if it’s something like commercial-scale green energy technology.  Facebook is, after all, a social network, and can appear frivolous.  If you want to be taken seriously, a blog is a better choice.
  • Your consumer customers are on the cusp: some of them live online, some don’t. Do some real testing to see if the results are worth your time and effort before committing to a program.

You probably shouldn’t, if…

  • You’re going on Facebook only because you keep hearing that you should.
  • You think it will instantly make your solid, traditional brand look hip.  It won’t.
  • You’re a traditional b-to-b with traditional sales channels. Hardly anyone we know develops fan-like zeal for a particular brand of rooftop tarring materials or network-management software.  Customers may love your products, but they almost never feel compelled to shout “Hinkley’s Industrial Packing Tape rocks!” Nor are they likely to visit you on Facebook.
  • You don’t have the resources to maintain it.
  • You want to protect your content.

And that brings us to…

The Great Facebook Content Hitch

Quick quiz: Who owns your Facebook content?

A. You do.
B. You do, but Facebook co-owns it as long as you’re a member.
C. Facebook does, forever and for all time.
D. You do, but Facebook can borrow it as long as it’s on your page.

Most people think that the answer is (A).  It’s actually never been (A).  For most of Facebook’s history, it was (B).  Except for a strange, unsettling period lasting from February ’09 until just recently, when it was (C).  In fact, during the megalomaniacal fever dream that was Policy (C), the company claimed “unending and irrevocable license to use any content uploaded to its service”. (Read more: Concern over new Facebook content rules – Wichita Business Journal)

Scary. Creepy. And with the potential to collect all user-posted content into some giant Wikibook or Faceipedia.  (One can only imagine the lengthy entry on uses of the word “dude”, or the photo essays on the topic, “Me and My Friends at a Party.”)

Facebook’s policy is now (D), to wit:

“You own all of the content and information you post on Facebook, and you can control how it is shared through your privacy and application settings. In addition:

  1. For content that is covered by intellectual property rights, like photos and videos (“IP content”), you specifically give us the following permission, subject to your privacy and application settings: you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook (“IP License”). This IP License ends when you delete your IP content or your account unless your content has been shared with others, and they have not deleted it.”

(Read the full statement on Facebook.)

As far as I know, Facebook has not ever used these considerable powers over content, let alone abused them. But the potential for such unlimited (albeit temporary, as long as Policy D is in force) power over content makes me nervous.

This is a big deal, because content is expensive. If your content is created in-house, you may think it’s cheap, or even free, but it is most definitely not.  This content, for example, took me a dang long time to write. In my opinion it’s a worthy investment, but it’s still a cost.

Of course, the best way to maximize that investment is to re-use your content. Facebook’s content ownership policy has the potential to diminish or dilute your ability to do just that. How? Here are two hypothetical examples of what Facebook could theoretically do under this policy:

  1. You have a line of clothing that you market to pre-teen girls.  Every week, you liven up your Facebook page with a clever, quotable saying.  Eventually you decide to put these sayings on your back-to-school tees.  Only Facebook has already loaded them into a highly popular rotating widget and printed them on bumper stickers, none of it tied to your brand. Now you’ll look like you got them from Facebook, not the other way around.
  2. Your company is the world’s leading expert on dust-repelling heating ducts. To save money and time, you use your Facebook fan page as a blog instead of setting up a real one.  You post answers to customers’ FAQs. You and your engineers write about how to achieve smooth installations and why your ducts are the best ducts of all time.
    After a while, almost without trying, you have the makings of the kick-ass white paper that you’ve been putting off for years.  You have loads of text and pictures to enrich your content-starved website.  Only by now, Facebook has launched Faceipedia, and the article under “Dustless Ducts” has all your accumulated wisdom. Nobody needs to go to your branded site, or to download your white paper.

I don’t know that Facebook wants to do any of these things. They probably don’t. But the fact that they might be able to should give you pause about what kind of content you post there.

It would be lovely if Facebook could make you instantly cool, drive millions of new customers to your door, and allow you to eliminate all but a pittance of your marketing budget. But the fact is that it’s pretty much like all marketing tools: valuable for some, highly effective when used with skill to the right target audiences, and no magic bullet.