Posts Tagged ‘social media’

4 Tips For Writing Better Social Media Content

Woman cringing at what she reads

Here’s how to generate blog and Facebook content that gets the job done — and avoids the cringe factor

What follows is a true story. The names have been changed to protect the embarrassed.

Imagine that you are an ad agency in search of a technology partner for some upcoming projects and proposals. You do your research, come up with a couple of candidates, and contact them.

Between the time that you leave a voicemail for the CEO of one of them, and the time that he calls you back — not long; less than two hours — you go back to the website to explore some of the company’s portfolio examples and case studies in detail.

On a blog maintained by one of the company’s executives and featured prominently on their home page, there’s a description of an intriguing and innovative project. And these sentences:

“While the technology is exciting, in our opinion the execution was sub-par. We blame the lazy ad agency that the client hired to design the interface.”

Really. It really said that.

By the time the CEO called back, the last of those two sentences was burned into my brain. I don’t know anything about the ad agency or the partnership. I don’t want to know. I just know that I don’t want to risk being called a “lazy ad agency” for posterity. So even though I tried to have a polite conversation with the CEO, I wound up telling him we weren’t interested in doing business with his company — and why.

He was surprised and embarrassed. He had no idea that his exec’s blog entry said that. (The offending language was removed within minutes of our conversation.) He apologized. He explained that their blog entries are triggered by their SEO specialist, who prompts one of the blogging execs to write a new entry when needed. The strategy is working as part of their other SEO efforts; they regularly rank at the top of search engine results.

But they forgot something important: if you do it right, the content you write for SEO — for machines — will also be read by people. Machines can only take you so far: they’ll score your content and place you where they think it’s appropriate in search engine results. But only human beings can act on your content in a away that benefits your bottom line. Search-engine algorithms don’t have money. People do.

SEO is a path to human beings, not a goal in itself

“You’re not writing for people, you’re writing for Google.”

This was the amusing reminder given to me by a friend and colleague, when I first began writing this blog. Back then, no one was reading it except Google, Yahoo, and Bing. In most cases, it takes a long time, and a lot of effort, to build an audience of human followers. So it’s easy to forget that readers are at the end of that chain.

You may start a blog or Facebook page to increase your SEO rankings. But if you’re successful, people will read it. And what they read had better be something you’ll be proud of.

The Internet is Not Invisible

Only eleven years separate us from the previous century, but in that time, there’s been a sea change that’s hard for many of us to internalize:

Anything that’s posted to the public Internet is instantly visible to nearly everyone in the world, and it has the potential to stay public forever.

Most of the time, that’s a good thing. But if you forget those facts, it can backfire. Ask any old-school politician who forgets that you can no longer give one policy position to one audience, and a different policy position to an another. Ask any college student who has forgotten that his parents can see Facebook, too.

So how do you take advantage of the very real SEO benefits of blogs and social media content, without saying something you’ll regret? Here are four steps to help you get the best and avoid the worst.

1. Wait a day.

Your blog software has a “Draft” button. Use it.

Open up your blog software, type a few paragraphs, hit “Publish” and you’re done. Check off “write blog entry” from your GTD list. Easy! But not smart.

Instead, wait a day, read your draft again, and then publish. You might catch something that’s minor, like a confusing sentence or a misspelled word. Or you might prevent disaster, when you realize that you accidentally said something you (or your customers, your boss, your stockholders) will regret.

If you find that you can’t resist the instant gratification of the “Publish” button, write your blog entries in an offline application, like a word-processing program. That gives you the added bonus of having an archived copy of your bloggerific wisdom. This will come in handy someday, when you write your memoirs.

Waiting a day is the same advice that your English teacher gave you when you were in school, when he or she taught you the draft/review/revise process for good writing. Even if you were the kind of kid who compressed all those steps into one glorious sheet of notebook paper written on the bus, don’t do it now. You’re a grownup, and there’s revenue at stake.

2. Get a second opinion

“Um, buddy, you might want to re-think that comment about the boss’s nephew.”

Have someone else in your organization read your blog entry or Facebook content before you publish it. If you’re in a large organization, someone in the marketing/communications department is ideally suited for the task — they’re already steeped in company messaging, and know how to fix spelling mistakes.

If you’re in a smaller organization, trade with another content author, if there is one. In a pinch, any other pair of eyes is better than no review.

3. Develop and distribute a content policy

It’s like swimming-pool safety rules for your public image

The CEO of the company that I turned down had no idea what anyone said on their blogs — until our conversation, at least, his only interest in his employees’ content was whether or not it worked well for SEO. I’ve had clients that have never seen their own Facebook pages; they just know that someone on their staff maintains one.

Everyone’s pretty new new at navigating the waters of social media, so give your employees some guidelines, in the form of a content policy.

  • Tell people what they should and should not say.
  • Keep it short, sweet, and simple, so that it will actually be used. One page of guidelines, plus a few examples, will be more effective than a fat three-ring binder that governs every conceivable issue.
  • Introduce it at a meeting, and give content authors a chance to ask questions.
  • Post it on your company’s intranet, so that employees can find it easily.
  • Revise as needed.

4. Define a content goal

Fill your website, white papers, and case study files — painlessly

Ask any kid, and they’ll tell you that the most dreaded essay assignment is the one where they’re told to write about anything they want. It’s too broad. It practically invites procrastination, rambling, and repetition.

Happily, there’s a cure: narrow the focus. When you do that for an organization’s content management, you double the value of your content with half the effort. Simply ask your content authors to write all or part of their content with a specific goal in mind.

  • If you’re a service company, the goal can be to write about case studies. The blog has immediate interest, and you get a steady stream of case studies that you can add to your website or include in presentations.
  • If you’re a consumer company, the goal can be to write a series of helpful or seasonal tips. After a few months, you have enough information for a booklet to hand out to customers.
  • If you’re a nonprofit, the goal can be to write about current projects. You can later repurpose that information into material on your website or in your annual report.
  • If you’re a manufacturer or software developer, the goal can be to develop content that can later be used in white papers. White papers are still valuable as offers to some audiences, but many companies dread the time and effort it takes to produce them. An engineer’s blog can give you a head start on that content.

Of course, all of this content will have to be edited and/or expanded to suit its new context, medium, and purpose. But with the right blog content, much of the work is already done. I’ve even known authors who use their blogs to draft their books one chapter at a time.

For more information about, and options for, creating and managing high-quality content, check out C3 Advertising’s Social Media Content Services.

Who Owns Your Facebook Content?

Note: This was originally part of a longer posting from 2010. I’ve had a lot of questions lately about using Facebook more extensively as a marketing tool. It makes sense for a lot of organizations, as long as it’s a) part of a coherent strategy, and b) includes relevant content. But few people are aware of the significant copyright issues surrounding Facebook. That’s why I’m reposting this as a standalone topic. I’ve made minor edits and clarifications. You can see the original posting here.

The Great Facebook Content Catch

Quick quiz: Who owns your Facebook content?

A. You do.
B. You do, but Facebook co-owns it as long as you’re a member.
C. Facebook does, forever and for all time.
D. You do, but Facebook can borrow it as long as it’s on your page, or even after you take it off your page, if someone else has posted it on their page. Effectively, Facebook can use it as long as it’s on a Facebook server.

Most people think that the answer is (A).  It’s actually never been (A).  For most of Facebook’s history, it was (B).  Except for a strange, unsettling period lasting from February ’09 until the spring of 2010, when it was (C).  In fact, during the megalomaniacal fever dream that was Policy (C), the company claimed “unending and irrevocable license to use any content uploaded to its service”. (Read more: Concern over new Facebook content rules – Wichita Business Journal)

Scary. Creepy. And with the potential to collect all user-posted content into some giant Wikibook or Faceipedia.  (One can only imagine the lengthy entry on uses of the word “dude”, or the photo essays on the topic, “Me and My Friends at a Party.”)

Facebook’s policy is now (D), to wit:

“You own all of the content and information you post on Facebook, and you can control how it is shared through your privacy and application settings. In addition:

  1. For content that is covered by intellectual property rights, like photos and videos (“IP content”), you specifically give us the following permission, subject to your privacy and application settings: you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook (“IP License”). This IP License ends when you delete your IP content or your account unless your content has been shared with others, and they have not deleted it.”

(Read the full statement on Facebook.)

As far as I know, Facebook has not ever used these considerable powers over content, let alone abused them. But the potential for such unlimited (albeit temporary, as long as Policy D is in force) power over content makes me nervous.

This is a big deal, because content is expensive. If your content is created in-house, you may think it’s cheap, or even free, but it is most definitely not.  This content, for example, took me a dang long time to write. In my opinion it’s a worthy investment, but it’s still a cost.

Of course, the best way to maximize that investment is to re-use your content. Facebook’s content ownership policy has the potential to diminish or dilute your ability to do just that. How? Here are two hypothetical examples of what Facebook could theoretically do under this policy:

  1. You have a line of clothing that you market to pre-teen girls.  Every week, you liven up your Facebook page with a clever, quotable saying.  Eventually you decide to put these sayings on your back-to-school tees.  Only Facebook has already loaded them into a highly popular rotating widget and printed them on bumper stickers, none of it tied to your brand. Now you’ll look like you got them from Facebook, not the other way around.
  2. Your company is the world’s leading expert on dust-repelling heating ducts. To save money and time, you use your Facebook fan page as a blog instead of setting up a real one.  You post answers to customers’ FAQs. You and your engineers write about how to achieve smooth installations and why your ducts are the best ducts of all time.
    After a while, almost without trying, you have the makings of the kick-ass white paper that you’ve been putting off for years.  You have loads of text and pictures to enrich your content-starved website.  Only by now, Facebook has launched Faceipedia, and the article under “Dustless Ducts” has all your accumulated wisdom. Nobody needs to go to your branded site, or to download your white paper.

I don’t know that Facebook wants to do any of these things. They probably don’t. But the fact that they might be able to should give you pause about what kind of content you post there.

It would be lovely if Facebook could make you instantly cool, drive millions of new customers to your door, and allow you to eliminate all but a pittance of your marketing budget. But the fact is that it’s pretty much like all marketing tools: valuable for some, highly effective when used with skill to the right target audiences, and no magic bullet.

Update: New Study Shows Twitter Fails for Marketers

Two short weeks ago, I wrote that 80% of marketers probably don’t need Twitter. I may have been wrong by an order of magnitude.

Bye, bye, Bluebird?

As Ad Age reported on July 27, “a six-month analysis of the service’s ubiquitous 140-character messages conducted by digital agency 360i” confirmed an advertiser’s deepest fears: they’re not talking about your brand on Twitter.

In fact, they’re not talking about any brands on Twitter. Well, a few, in order: Twitter, Apple, Google, YouTube, Microsoft, Blackberry, Amazon, Facebook, Snuggie*, eBay and Starbucks.

Even this blessed handful only gets mentioned in the course of normal conversation, not in any interaction with or about the brand. It’s a lot of tweets like, “Jason posted on Facebook that he got a job at Starbucks. Want to meet me there at 3:00 and see if he’ll give us a free latte?”

But almost none at all like, “OMG, I just tried the new Orange Mango Vivanno(tm) Smoothie at Starbucks. To die for!”

As marketers, we shouldn’t be at all surprised. It’s just as unrealistic to expect consumers to Tweet about our brands as it once was to think that housewives met over backyard fences to discuss laundry detergents.  The behavior of consumers who use Twitter has proven, once again, that our customers are human beings, not aliens.

Thank God. Now we can go back to talking to them like people.


*I’m completely baffled by the inclusion of Snuggie on the list. Perhaps they did the study during a particularly nasty cold snap.

.

Do You Need To Be On Twitter?

If you’re like 80% of businesses, you can safely  ignore the cute little bird. Here’s why.

Twitter Bluebird of Happiness

I got a chance to catch up with my friend Marti Barletta last week. It was delightful, as always, and fun to catch up on news of our lives, work, and families. But when the talk came around to marketing, Marti shared two astonishing bits of information.

  1. She is now among the top .05% of Tweeters in terms of followers.
  2. She has just over 700 followers.

You read that right, and because you can do math, you know what means: 99.5% of Tweeters have fewer than 700 followers.

How can this be, you ask?  Twitter is EVERYWHERE!  Dell, Walmart, and Four Seasons Hotels invite you to follow them on Twitter.  Cable news anchorpersons read tweets on the air. You know that Lindsay Lohan is upset, and that Aston and Demi are doing The Cleanse, because they posted it on Twitter. Maybe you even opened a Twitter account, just because you thought you should, and you haven’t used it since a month after you opened it.  The Old Spice Guy is responding to tweets via a whole series of towel-clad videos on YouTube.

And that’s why you should be on Twitter, if you want to bring your marketing program into the 21st century, right? Wrong.

In fact, everything I just said is why, if you’re like 80% of businesses, you probably won’t gain a thing by being on Twitter. You won’t have much to lose, either, unless you post things that are incredibly stupid — but you will be wasting your time.  Here’s why:

Dell, Walmart, and Four Seasons invite you to follow them on Twitter. Have you accepted? No? Why not? Because you don’t care? Because you have enough stuff to follow already?  Because you’d rather get information some other way?  Because you don’t have a Twitter account?  Because your Twitter account is somewhere…you think…maybe under the bed with the dust bunnies?

Twitter can be a good tool for communicating breaking tech news and frequent sales and other offers, but it’s not the only tool — and maybe not even the best one. Unless you post your Twitter feed elsewhere, you’ll only reach your Twitter followers.  They won’t stumble across your message on a casual visit to your website, blog, Facebook page, user forum or message board, or even mobile app.  So you might get traction that’s just as good, or even better, via one of those other channels.

Cable news anchorpersons read tweets on the air. News organizations use Twitter a lot, mostly as a tool to get up-to-the-minute information that they can follow up with traditional reporting. Why do cable news networks read tweets on the air? Partly, I’m sure, because it’s a faster — and shorter — way to get viewer feedback than traditional letters to the editor.  Partly, I suspect, because they have 24 hours of air time to fill. Every single dang stupid day.  If you’re not in the news business, you may not need Twitter.

You know that Lindsay Lohan is upset, and that Aston and Demi are doing The Cleanse, because they posted it on Twitter. But I’ll bet you read it on The Huffington Post, or People.com, or heard it on Entertainment Tonight.  Even for celebrities and other heavy Twitter users, the news is disseminated to the wider world via bigger channels.

Maybe you even opened a Twitter account, just because you thought you should, and you haven’t used it since a month after you opened it. You’re not alone. A study last year by Nielsen reported that Twitter has an alarming 60% churn rate — that is, 60% of Twitter users abandon their accounts within the first 30 days.

Tamagotchi, C. 1998Twitter is like owning a Tamagotchi. Some people love it. Others find it amusing at first, and then kind of a pain.  And that’s the other side of Twitter — if you intend to use it for marketing, you have to keep feeding it, preferably every single dang stupid day.  You’re going out to an audience that is not quite as engaged as you might think, so you have to constantly give them something really interesting and fresh.

If you’re a celebrity trend-setter (or a celebrity train wreck),  your very life is the drama that your followers want to know about.  If you’re speaking for your company, not so much. That’s probably why even some very famous brands don’t have Twitter feeds. Take Clorox, for example. What are they going to say?  ”Day 2,327: still getting socks 30% whiter.”

The Old Spice Man is responding to tweets via videos on YouTube. Think about this sentence for a moment. Instead of responding to Tweets via Twitter, they’re responding via YouTube. Limitations of the medium aside, why might that be?  How about because there are a lot more people visiting YouTube than using Twitter?

As with all things on the Web, that’s the state of the art at this moment.  Things may change, and there may come a day when a Twitter feed is an indispensable marketing tool. But for most of us, that day is not yet.

Should You Be On Facebook?

Smashing Magazine had a very useful posting yesterday on how to create effective fan pages on Facebook. It turns out that creating an effective Facebook fan page takes just as much effort, design sense, good copywriting, and marketing savvy as any other advertising effort. Most of all, like the “real” web, an effective Facebook fan page also takes carefully crafted content with a high perceived value.

To that I say: duh. Too bad, but, duh.

(What’s a “fan page”? Unlike the U.S. Supreme Court, Facebook believes that people are different from business entities. This means that your business can have a  ”fan page,” but not a “profile”.  There are more restrictions on a fan page than on a profile; for example, you don’t have the ability to add friends.  The penalty for confusing the two is abrupt and ignominious removal from the Facebook universe. Ironically, that means it’s easier for a business to be tossed out than for an individual to erase their Facebook presence voluntarily.  So if you’re having trouble closing your Facebook profile account, I suggest you try changing your name to Giant Corporation, Inc. and see if they’ll close it down for you.)

Should your business even have a Facebook Fan Page?

It’s probably worth a try, if…

  • You’ve got a consumer brand that customers regularly engage with, or get passionate about.  Cars. Trendy clothing. Starbuck’s. A rock band. Organic knitting wool. Artisan olive oil. Boutique wines.
  • Your target market is a heavy user of Facebook. Examine your market closely. There is a big difference between “has a Facebook account” and “lives on Facebook”.
  • You offer a lot of coupons, short-term offers, or events. Facebook lends itself well to these kinds of programs.
  • You do it right, both creatively, and as part of a thoughtful online strategy.  This is not a task to leave to the summer intern.
  • You have all your other marketing ducks in a row. Facebook is cheap — however, as I’ll show in a minute, by no means free — but it’s no substitute for a real marketing program.

It wouldn’t hurt, and might help, if…

  • You’re a business-to-business marketer with an offbeat brand.
  • You have a cutting-edge product in an emerging field where there is a lot of discussion between product creators and end-users/consumers. But be cautious — where Facebook might be a good forum for interaction and brand-building if your product is a highly experimental surfboard, I’d steer clear if it’s something like commercial-scale green energy technology.  Facebook is, after all, a social network, and can appear frivolous.  If you want to be taken seriously, a blog is a better choice.
  • Your consumer customers are on the cusp: some of them live online, some don’t. Do some real testing to see if the results are worth your time and effort before committing to a program.

You probably shouldn’t, if…

  • You’re going on Facebook only because you keep hearing that you should.
  • You think it will instantly make your solid, traditional brand look hip.  It won’t.
  • You’re a traditional b-to-b with traditional sales channels. Hardly anyone we know develops fan-like zeal for a particular brand of rooftop tarring materials or network-management software.  Customers may love your products, but they almost never feel compelled to shout “Hinkley’s Industrial Packing Tape rocks!” Nor are they likely to visit you on Facebook.
  • You don’t have the resources to maintain it.
  • You want to protect your content.

And that brings us to…

The Great Facebook Content Hitch

Quick quiz: Who owns your Facebook content?

A. You do.
B. You do, but Facebook co-owns it as long as you’re a member.
C. Facebook does, forever and for all time.
D. You do, but Facebook can borrow it as long as it’s on your page.

Most people think that the answer is (A).  It’s actually never been (A).  For most of Facebook’s history, it was (B).  Except for a strange, unsettling period lasting from February ’09 until just recently, when it was (C).  In fact, during the megalomaniacal fever dream that was Policy (C), the company claimed “unending and irrevocable license to use any content uploaded to its service”. (Read more: Concern over new Facebook content rules – Wichita Business Journal)

Scary. Creepy. And with the potential to collect all user-posted content into some giant Wikibook or Faceipedia.  (One can only imagine the lengthy entry on uses of the word “dude”, or the photo essays on the topic, “Me and My Friends at a Party.”)

Facebook’s policy is now (D), to wit:

“You own all of the content and information you post on Facebook, and you can control how it is shared through your privacy and application settings. In addition:

  1. For content that is covered by intellectual property rights, like photos and videos (“IP content”), you specifically give us the following permission, subject to your privacy and application settings: you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook (“IP License”). This IP License ends when you delete your IP content or your account unless your content has been shared with others, and they have not deleted it.”

(Read the full statement on Facebook.)

As far as I know, Facebook has not ever used these considerable powers over content, let alone abused them. But the potential for such unlimited (albeit temporary, as long as Policy D is in force) power over content makes me nervous.

This is a big deal, because content is expensive. If your content is created in-house, you may think it’s cheap, or even free, but it is most definitely not.  This content, for example, took me a dang long time to write. In my opinion it’s a worthy investment, but it’s still a cost.

Of course, the best way to maximize that investment is to re-use your content. Facebook’s content ownership policy has the potential to diminish or dilute your ability to do just that. How? Here are two hypothetical examples of what Facebook could theoretically do under this policy:

  1. You have a line of clothing that you market to pre-teen girls.  Every week, you liven up your Facebook page with a clever, quotable saying.  Eventually you decide to put these sayings on your back-to-school tees.  Only Facebook has already loaded them into a highly popular rotating widget and printed them on bumper stickers, none of it tied to your brand. Now you’ll look like you got them from Facebook, not the other way around.
  2. Your company is the world’s leading expert on dust-repelling heating ducts. To save money and time, you use your Facebook fan page as a blog instead of setting up a real one.  You post answers to customers’ FAQs. You and your engineers write about how to achieve smooth installations and why your ducts are the best ducts of all time.
    After a while, almost without trying, you have the makings of the kick-ass white paper that you’ve been putting off for years.  You have loads of text and pictures to enrich your content-starved website.  Only by now, Facebook has launched Faceipedia, and the article under “Dustless Ducts” has all your accumulated wisdom. Nobody needs to go to your branded site, or to download your white paper.

I don’t know that Facebook wants to do any of these things. They probably don’t. But the fact that they might be able to should give you pause about what kind of content you post there.

It would be lovely if Facebook could make you instantly cool, drive millions of new customers to your door, and allow you to eliminate all but a pittance of your marketing budget. But the fact is that it’s pretty much like all marketing tools: valuable for some, highly effective when used with skill to the right target audiences, and no magic bullet.

3 Lessons From the $500 Solution, Part 2

I recently wrote about how a one-time investment of $500 could help computer companies — and Adobe — sell thousands more units this year.  What follows is a summary of the lessons all organizations can learn form that industry’s mistakes.

Lesson #2: There’s no substitute for continual, meaningful communication within your organization.

You can put down your Blackberries and iPhones and stop updating your Twitter feed for a moment. I’m not talking about constantly touching base. I’m talking about serious, focused, intense sharing about who your customers are and how they use your products and services.

I encourage all my clients to conduct something I call a Quarterly Convergence. This is a formal meeting that includes a representative of every department that touches your customer: sales, marketing, customer service, R&D, product management, channel marketing, billing, management,and your ad agency. We sit down with a full pot of coffee, a basket of bagels, and no cell phones, and talk about the customer: who they are, what they want, how they’re using the client’s products and services.

I won’t go into detail about how this works, but I will say this:  the result is always enlightening and always helps the organization become more effective.

Very often, it also results in extremely rapid development of new products and/or markets. That’s because — imagine this! – your customers are under no obligation to use your products or services in they way that you intended. They come up with all kinds of innovative ways to use whatever it is that you sell. And when they do that, they frequently call your support lines, mention it to a sales rep, or post in an online review. In most organizations, that extraordinarily valuable intelligence goes nowhere. But if it’s shared, you can turn a hidden demand into sales.

Had the product teams from Sony, Toshiba, Apple, Adobe, HP, Intel, or any of the other players in my example been doing this, they would have instantly seen the value of providing the information that customers in this niche need to make a buying decision.  And speaking of niche markets…See next post.